26dems Homepage
Tech Advisory: This web page is best viewed in Firefox, Safari, or Internet Explorer version 7 and newer. You may have to upgrade Adobe Flashplayer if you experience problems. Report any problem to the webmaster.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Manchurian Candidates: Supreme Court allows China and others unlimited spending in US elections

26Dems Editorial note: Last December, Greg Palast warned us of an impending Supreme Court decision favoring corporations in Citizens United case.

See Alternet: Supreme Court's Ruling Would Allow Bin Laden to Contribute to Sarah Palin's Presidential Campaign

By Greg Palast | Updated from the original report for AlterNet
Greg.palast.com
Thursday, January 21, 2010

In today's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Court ruled that corporations should be treated the same as "natural persons", i.e. humans. Well, in that case, expect the Supreme Court to next rule that Wal-Mart can run for President.

The ruling, which junks federal laws that now bar corporations from stuffing campaign coffers, will not, as progressives fear, cause an avalanche of corporate cash into politics. Sadly, that's already happened: we have been snowed under by tens of millions of dollars given through corporate PACs and "bundling" of individual contributions from corporate pay-rollers.

The Court's decision is far, far more dangerous to U.S. democracy. Think: Manchurian candidates.